Sunday 25 December 2011

What is Emotional Abuse?

(Originally published in my sports page column Self-Propelled
in the Dec. 25 to 31, 2011 issue of the Baguio Chronicle
--- a weekly newspaper based in Baguio City, Philippines.)

ABUSE is any behavior that is designed to control and subjugate another human being through the use of fear, humiliation, and verbal or physical assaults.

Emotional abuse is any kind of abuse that is emotional rather than physical in nature. It can include anything from verbal abuse and constant criticism to more subtle tactics, such as intimidation, manipulation, and refusal to ever be pleased.

It is like brain washing in that it systematically wears away at the victim’s self-confidence, sense of self-worth, trust in their own perceptions, and self-concept. Whether it is done by constant berating and belittling, by intimidation, or under the guise of “guidance,” “teaching,” or “advice,” the results are similar. Eventually, the recipient of the abuse loses all sense of self and remnants of personal value. Emotional abuse cuts to the very core of a person, creating scars that may be far deeper and more lasting than physical ones.

There are three known general patterns of abusive behavior: aggressing, denying, and minimizing.

AGGRESSING: Aggressive forms of abuse include name-calling, accusing, blaming, threatening, and ordering. Aggressing behaviors are generally direct and obvious. The one-up position the abuser assumes by attempting to judge or invalidate the recipient undermines the equality and autonomy that are essential to healthy adult relationships. This parent-to-child pattern of communication (which is common to all forms of verbal abuse) is most obvious when the abuser takes an aggressive stance.

Aggressive abuse can also take a more indirect form and may even be disguised as “helping.” Criticizing, advising, offering solutions, analyzing, probing, and questioning another person may be a sincere attempt to help. In some instances, however, these behaviors may be an attempt to belittle, control, or demean rather than help. The underlying judgmental “I know best” tone the abuser takes in these situations is inappropriate and creates unequal footing in peer relationships.

DENYING: Invalidating seeks to distort or undermine the recipient’s perceptions of their world. Invalidating occurs when the abuser refuses or fails to acknowledge reality. For example, if the recipient confronts the abuser about an incident of name calling, the abuser may insist “I never said that”, “I don’t know what you’re talking about”, etc.

Withholding is another form of denying. Withholding includes refusing to listen, refusing to communicate, and emotionally withdrawing as punishment. This is sometimes called the “silent treatment.”

Countering occurs when the abuser views the recipient as an extension of themselves and denies any viewpoints or feelings which differ from their own.

MINIMIZING: Minimizing is a less extreme form of denial. When minimizing, the abuser may not deny that a particular event occurred, but they question the recipient’s emotional experience or reaction to an event. Statements such as “You’re too sensitive,” “You’re exaggerating,” or “You’re blowing this out of proportion” all suggest that the recipient’s emotions and perceptions are faulty and not to be trusted.

Trivializing, which occurs when the abuser suggests that what you have done or communicated is inconsequential or unimportant, is a more subtle form of minimizing.

Denying and minimizing can be particularly damaging. In addition to lowering self-esteem and creating conflict, the invalidation of reality, feelings, and experiences can eventually lead you to question and mistrust your own perceptions and emotional experience.

Understanding Abusive Relationships

NO one intends to be in an abusive relationship, but individuals who were verbally abused by a parent or other significant person often find themselves in similar situations as an adult. If a parent tended to define your experiences and emotions, and judge your behaviors, you may not have learned how to set your own standards, develop your own viewpoints, and validate your own feelings and perceptions. Consequently, the controlling and defining stance taken by an emotional abuser may feel familiar or even comfortable to you, although it is destructive.

Recipients of abuse often struggle with feelings of powerlessness, hurt, fear, and anger. Ironically, abusers tend to struggle with these same feelings. Abusers are also likely to have been raised in emotionally abusive environments and they learn to be abusive as a way to cope with their own feelings of powerlessness, hurt, fear and anger. Consequently, abusers may be attracted to people who see themselves as helpless or who have not learned to value their own feelings, perceptions, or viewpoints. This allows the abuser to feel more secure and in control, and avoid dealing with their own feelings and self-perceptions.

Understanding the pattern of your relationships, especially those with family members and other significant people, is a first step toward change. A lack of clarity about who you are in relationship to significant others may manifest itself in different ways. For example, you may act as an “abuser” in some instances and as a “recipient” in others. You may find that you tend to be abused in your romantic relationships, allowing your partners to define and control you. In friendships, however, you may play the role of abuser by withholding, manipulating, trying to “help” others, etc. Knowing yourself and understanding your past can prevent abuse from being recreated in your life.

Are You Abusive to Yourself?

Often we allow people into our lives who treat us as we expect to be treated. If we feel contempt for ourselves or think very little of ourselves, we may pick partners or significant others who reflect this image back to us. If we are willing to tolerate negative treatment from others, or treat others in negative ways, it is possible that we also treat ourselves similarly. If you are an abuser or a recipient, you may want to consider how you treat yourself. What sorts of things do you say to yourself? Do thoughts such as “I’m stupid” or “I never do anything right” dominate your thinking? Learning to love and care for ourselves increases self-esteem and makes it more likely that we will have healthy, intimate relationships.

Basic Rights in a Relationship

If you have been involved in emotionally abusive relationships, you may not have a clear idea of what a healthy relationship is like. Patricia Evans (The Verbally Abusive Relationship: How to Recognize It and How to Respond. Holbrook, Massachusetts: Bob Adams, Inc., 1992) suggests the following as basic rights in a relationship for you and your partner:

• The right to good will from the other.
• The right to emotional support.
• The right to be heard by the other and to be responded to with courtesy.
• The right to have your own view, even if your partner has a different view.
• The right to have your feelings and experience acknowledged as real.
• The right to receive a sincere apology for any jokes you may find offensive.
• The right to clear and informative answers to questions that concern what is legitimately your business.
• The right to live free from accusation and blame.
• The right to live free from criticism and judgment.
• The right to have your work and your interests spoken of with respect.
• The right to encouragement.
• The right to live free from emotional and physical threat.
• The right to live free from angry outbursts and rage.
• The right to be called by no name that devalues you.
• The right to be respectfully asked rather than ordered.

What Can You Do?

Educate yourself about emotionally abusive relationships. Two excellent resources include:

Engle, Beverly, M.F.C.C. The Emotionally Abused Woman: Overcoming Destructive Patterns and Reclaiming Yourself. New York: Fawcett Columbine, 1992.

Evans, Patricia. The Verbally Abusive Relationship: How to Recognize It and How to Respond. Holbrook, Massachusetts: Bob Adams, Inc., 1992.

Consider seeing a mental health professional. A counselor can help you understand the impact of an emotionally abusive relationship. A counselor can also help you learn healthier ways of relating to others and caring for your own needs.*

Saturday 24 December 2011

Emotional Abuse in the Workplace

(Originally published in my sports page column Self-Propelled
in the Dec. 18 to 24, 201 issue of the Baguio Chronicle
--- a weekly newspaper based in Baguio City, Philippines.)

WORKPLACE harassment by employers or managers should have no place in today's world. This is a fairly unrecognized issue yet is a serious problem affecting many people.

The level of emotional and psychological abuse in the workplace is difficult to determine. There are many horror stories of workplace stress that violate labor laws that are surfacing to employment lawyers.

Workplace bullying is usually seen as acts or verbal comments that can mentally hurt or isolate a person in the workplace. Bullying involves repeated incidents or a pattern of behavior that is intended to intimidate, offend, degrade or humiliate a particular person or group of people. It’s also described as the assertion of power through aggression.

Sometimes workplace harassment by employers can be very subtle or obvious. Some examples may be: excluding or isolating someone from certain benefits or opportunities; intimidation; undermining or deliberately impeding the employee from working; removing areas of responsibilities without just cause; constantly changing work guidelines; withholding information or providing wrong information; assigning unreasonable duties; not providing enough work to create a sense of uselessness; yelling or using profane language or persistently criticizing the employee.

People who are victims of workplace abuse may experience a range of effects. These reactions include shock, anger, total frustration, anxiety, increased sense of vulnerability, inability to sleep, loss of appetite, panic attacks about going to work, headaches, pains, inability to concentrate, or low morale and productivity.

WHAT TO DO

ALWAYS keep a daily journal to log what happened, the time it occurred and if there were any witnesses. Include as many details as possible about each incident. This information will be highly beneficial if the situation warrants outside intervention. Be sure to keep the journal private from other employees and place it in a safe location. Keep hardcopies (at your home) of any letters, memos, emails or faxes received by the employer or manager.

It is very important to never retaliate to a given situation as you may end up looking like the perpetrator. Remaining calm and appearing as though everything is fine is a very difficult yet necessary task and will take its toll. Be sure to have a support system of family and friends. Talking will release some of the stress. Finding safe methods of stress reduction is crucial to maintain good physical and mental health.

If you know someone who is suffering from workplace abuse be sure to provide as much support as possible. If you feel you are being bullied, discriminated or subjected to any form of harassment you need to get help. A place to start is the Department of Labor.*

*SOURCE: http://www.suite101.com/content/emotional-abuse-in-the-workplace-a73977

Sunday 11 December 2011

‘TV Patrol’ and tabloid journalism

(Originally published in my sports page column Self-Propelled
in the Dec. 11 to 17, 2011 issue of the Baguio Chronicle
--- a weekly newspaper based in Baguio City, Philippines.)

THERE was a time when newscasts left sensational stories such as bloody killings and sex scandals to the tabloids and newscasters like Jose Mari Velez and Bong Lapira had the same calm, controlled voice in reporting good and bad news.

All of that changed in 1987 when ABS-CBN launched TV Patrol and unabashedly admitted that the network was shifting to tabloid journalism. The new one-hour format called for more crime stories (murders, rapes, kidnapping), showbiz developments (love triangles, marital break-ups, and sex scandals) and less issue-oriented stories.

On top of that, the news was delivered in Filipino, lingua franca of the mass audience and announcers were instructed to add several decibels to their voices. English newscasts such as The World Tonight, which featured more substantial topics, were moved to the ABS-CBN News Channel (ANC) where newscasters Tina Monzon-Palma and Angelo Castro delivered the news in a subdued manner.

The tabloid formula must have worked because TV Patrol managed to get unprecedented high ratings that attracted many advertisers. For once, the news department became a profit center for ABS-CBN. In the past, news operations always resulted in red ink but the network didn't mind because of the prestige that came with broadcast journalism.

More than two decades later, TV Patrol continues to follow the same format with some modifications. Anchors Noli de Castro, Korina Sanchez and Ted Failon now shout "TEEVEEE (long pause) PATROL" before commercial breaks. There is also a regular survey where viewers can answer ‘yes’ or ‘no’ to such questions as "Sapat na ba ang sampung libong piso para sa mga kawani ng gobyerno sa kapaskuhan?" Isn't it obvious that viewers will reply in the negative since most government employees are underpaid? Besides, non-scientific surveys do not necessarily reflect public opinion and may mislead the viewing audience.

The three comment on the news and exchange jokes at the end of the show. In most newscasts abroad, news anchors are not allowed to editorialize. Also, the network doesn't see anything wrong with a cabinet official's wife and a former vice president doing the news, not even when Noli was the subject of a news story on Pag-Ibig funds and Korina's hubby, Transportation and Communications Secretary Mar Roxas figured in several reports. Can you imagine former US vice president Dick Cheney anchoring a newscast?

To be fair, Noli and Mar are not involved in any form of impropriety. However, I have always believed newscasters should be perceived as objective. How can a news program be perceived as unbiased when two of its news anchors have political connections?

The ABS-CBN newscast probably obtained record-breaking ratings in the past two weeks with the Ramgen Bautista murder case and the Maguindanao Massacre hugging the headlines. These are two stories that deserve prominence on TV Patrol.

The Ramgen killing implicates the victim's relatives and involves a prominent family. The Maguindanao incident sent shock waves not just locally but also on the international scene because 58 people including 38 journalists were slaughtered.

I don't understand why minor stories like a motorcycle accident, a rumble involving Korean tourists, the mauling of an unknown ex-actor by a group of basketball players, none of which involved someone getting killed, are given importance on prime time. That's what happens when a network practices tabloid journalism.

GMA and TV5 have also joined the fray with the stentorian voices of Mike Enriquez and Erwin Tulfo.

On a positive note, TV Patrol shines when natural disasters such as storms, floods and earthquakes strike. The network goes all the way in informing viewers about the latest developments. Armed with modern TV equipment, ABS-CBN is able to air reports, most of which are supported by video, from different parts of the country. Its reporters brave the elements to give live updates from the field. The network is also quick to respond when it comes to distributing relief goods to calamity victims.

*Disclaimer: The views and observations of the author do not represent the position of Yahoo! Southeast Asia on the issue or topic being discussed.

**SOURCE: http://ph.omg.yahoo.com/blogs/switchingchannels/tv-patrol-tabloid-journalism-104015722.html

Saturday 3 December 2011

Look, Ma, No Hands!

(Originally published in my sports page column Self-Propelled
in the Dec. 4 to 10, 2011 issue of the Baguio Chronicle
--- a weekly newspaper based in Baguio City, Philippines)

YOUR Self-Propelled mourns the untimely demise of one of the most respected citizens of Baguio City, Mrs. Leonora Paraan-San Agustin.

Fr. Ranhilio Callangan Aquino perhaps said it best of Mrs. San Agustin, to quote: “(she) . . . was no softie, and she was not one to pamper us by assuring us that we were right and our persecutors wrong; she minced no words about what she thought about my arrogance and in sheer ineptitude at maintaining friendly relations with others; but I listened, harboring neither resentment nor concocting pretext because I knew she was wise, and do listen to her with attentiveness . . . she was a great teacher because of native gifts of intelligence and articulateness.”

-o0o-

PROFESSIONAL cyclists often raise their hands in victory crossing a finish line, but I’ve never had the occasion to do that.

Can you ride bike no-hands? Should you? Well, I believe it is a useful skill, even for us recreational cyclists.

Riding a bike without using your hands may be a pleasurable as well as an exciting obsession. But if proper practice is not done, it can be dangerous for you and to others.

Riding no-hands gives you the chance to do things without necessarily stopping or getting off the bike such as removing your arm warmers or vest, zipping-up your jacket, and cleaning your sunglasses. And while it probably only saves a minute, stopping interrupts your flow and pedaling momentum.

Riding no-hands takes a little technique and confidence to relinquish that control and once mastered, just becomes another practical tool in your skill set: TO USE ONLY AS NEEDED.

So, find a quiet road with no traffic or even an empty parking lot or at a nearby school campus during school breaks or a weekend. Make sure to wear your helmet and gloves in case you do take a tumble.

Pedal away at your normal pace. Don’t go slower as you need the momentum to keep the bike moving straight. Place both hands on top of the handlebar and sit square in the saddle. Now, simply push back evenly and sit up. Lift both hands at once. Don’t leave one hand on the bar as it will twist your body off center. Just sit back and keep your butt weighted in the saddle. Don’t lean forward or keep your hands hovering over the bar. Sit up straight, breathe, relax and have confidence. Remember to keep pedaling.

After a few tries, you’ll get the feel for it. Once you can get into the no-hands position easily, then you will be able to make the bike go where you want it to. Just use a minor hip/butt movement to control the bike and you can get around a rock or pothole in the road. During the execution, the bike is largely steered from your weight in the saddle and from your hips.

But if you find that you can’t keep a straight line, it may not be your technique. Your bike may be the problem. If your bike has not had regular or recent maintenance, something as simple as a wobbling (untrue) front wheel, or a misaligned fork or even a binding headset can make the bike feel squirrely.

DO NOT ride no-hands out in the open roads unless it is necessary and safe to do so.

This means waiting until the road is smooth and there’s not a lot of debris or gravel lying around that could put you into a skid. Make sure there are no gusty crosswinds, no traffic, no upcoming intersections, and nobody riding close to you. You don’t want to crash and you really don’t want to knock someone else down.

If in doubt, be safe and just stop.

Until then and have a safe ride all the time. Put on that cycling helmet each time you get on your bike. Remember: YOU CAN BEAT THE EGG WITHOUT BREAKING THE SHELL.* (SP28)*